Chemistry of Bulk Precipitation at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Watershed 5, 1963 - present
TITLE
Chemistry of Bulk Precipitation at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Watershed 5, 1963 - present
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR(s)
Gene E. Likens
Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
2801 Sharon Turnpike
Millbrook, NY 12545
USA

Phone: (845) 677-5343
ABSTRACT:
Precipitation chemistry has been measured at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest since 1963. This data set includes volume-weighted, average, monthly concentrations of cations, anions, and pH for watershed 5. Monthly averages are calculated from samples collected at weekly intervals from several bulk precipitation stations located in the experimental watersheds.
KEYWORD SET: Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study LTER
aluminum, ammonium, calcium, chemistry, chloride, HBEF Watershed 5, HBR, Hubbard Brook LTER, magnesium, nitrate, pH, phosphate, potassium, precipitation, rain, silica, sodium, sulfate, watershed.
KEYWORD SET: LTER Core Research Areas
disturbance, inorganic nutrients.
BEGIN DATE
1963
END DATE
2014
LOCATION
HBEF watershed 5 (WS-5). Primary bulk collector located at HBEF RG-11 (elev. 550m above MSL) 25m northeast of WS-6 stream gauging station; secondary bulk collector located at HBEF RG-1 (elev. 525m above MSL), 50m northeast of WS-1 stream gauging station, and 850m northeast of RG-11 site. The coordinates given correspond to watershed 5.
West bounding coordinate: -71.739853
East bounding coordinate: -71.687683
North bounding coordinate: 43.957100
South bounding coordinate: 43.939945
SAMPLING DESIGN
Continuously-open, bulk collectors (clean plastic funnels-bottles in summer; 21-liter plastic buckets in winter) mounted on posts approximately 2 m above land surface within cleared openings in the forest. Samples are collected weekly, and all collection gear is acid-washed, de-ionized water-rinsed, and exchanged each week, regardless of whether precipitation occurs or not. Measurements of pH are determined at HBEF; ion analyses conducted at the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in Millbrook, NY.
These data represent an average of the chemistry (analyzed separately) from sites at RG-11 and RG-1.The chemistry of collections at both sites is not statistically different. In the event of contamination of either collector, the chemistry is used only from the clean site. Daily deposition values (in g/ha-mo) are derived by multiplying daily precipitation amounts (in mm) for Watershed 5, by the average weekly concentration of solutes from the bulk collectors (in mg/L) for the same period. Daily values are summed to produce monthly deposition, and deposition divided by total monthly precipitation to produce volume-weighted, average monthly concentrations for precipitation at HBEF WS-5.
In June 2013, after careful inter-laboratory comparisons, chemical analyses were transferred from the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Lab to the USDA Forest Service Lab in Durham, NH. Samples are split into 3 aliquots for different analyses. Monomeric Aluminum is measured on an unfiltered-refrigerated aliquot using an automated Pyrocatechol Violet method. A filtered-refrigerated aliquot is acidified and analyzed for cations and metals using ICP-OES (USEPA 200.7). A filtered-frozen sample is used for measuring NH4 (USEPA 350.1 Rev. 2.0), PO4 (USEPA 365.1 Rev. 2.0), Anions (USEPA 300.1) , DOC (USEPA 450.1) and TDN (High Temperature Catalytic Oxidation with chemiluminescent N detection).
REFERENCES
  • Buso, D.C., Likens, G.E., and Eaton, J.S. 2000. Chemistry of precipitation, streamwater, and lakewater from the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study: a record of sampling protocols and analytical procedures. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-275. 52 pp.USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, PA.
  • Butler, T.J., Likens, G.E., Vermeylen, F.M., and Stunder, B.J.B. 2005. The impact of changing nitrogen oxide emissions on wet and dry nitrogen deposition in the northeastern USA. Atmospheric Environment 39:4851-4862.
  • Federer, C.A., Flynn, L.D., Martin, C.W., Hornbeck, J.W., and Pierce, R.S. 1990. Thirty years of hydrometeorologic data at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-141. 44 pp.USDA Forest Service, Newtown Square, PA.
  • Fisher, D.W., Gambell, A.W., Likens, G.E., and Bormann, F.H. 1968. Atmospheric contributions to water quality of streams in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Water Resour. Res. 4(5):1115-1126.
  • Likens, G.E., Bormann, F.H., Johnson, N.M., and Pierce, R.S. 1967. The calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium budgets for a small forested ecosystem.. Ecology 48(5):772-785.
  • Likens, G.E., Bormann, F.H., Pierce, R.S., Eaton, J.S., and Johnson, N.M. 1977. Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 146 pp.
  • Likens, G.E., Buso, D.C., and Butler, T.J. 2005. Long-term relationships between SO2 and NOX emissions and SO42- and NO3- concentration in bulk deposition at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. J. Environ. Monitoring 7(10):964-968.
DATA ACCESS GUIDELINES
Data Access Guidelines for Streamwater Chemistry


We are happy to share these data on the chemistry of Hubbard Brook ecosystems. The public dissemination of these data that we have collected is a responsibility that we take very seriously. As stewards of these long-term data, our highest priorities are:


a. to maintain the integrity of these long-term data;


b. to allow adequate time for the analysis, quality assurance, and publication of results by principal investigators;


c. to acknowledge properly and responsibly the appropriate funding sources.


Therefore, it is HBES policy to make these streamwater data available on this web page two years after the date of collection. Also, in sharing these data with users like yourself, we ask that you adhere to the following guidelines as a matter of common courtesy and ethical responsibility:


1. Please inform us in advance of your interest and plans for use of these data (LikensG@ecostudies.org).


2. The sources of funding used to collect these data must be acknowledged properly. We will provide the appropriate information when we learn what data are being used.


3. We would like to review any manuscripts that utilize extensive amounts (e.g. multiple years) of these data. If data use is extensive, or if these data have not been published previously, it may be appropriate for us to be included as authors on publication that are generated given the additional requirements from us for analysis and interpretation.



Data Use Policy



The re-use of scientific data has the potential to greatly increase communication, collaboration and synthesis within and among disciplines, and thus is fostered, supported and encouraged. Permission to use this dataset is granted to the Data User free of charge subject to the following terms:

1) Acceptable use. Use of the dataset will be restricted to academic, research, government or other not-for-profit professional purposes.

2) Redistribution. The data and metadata are provided for use by the Data User. The Data User will not redistribute the original Data Set or metadata to others without the explicit permission of the Principal Investigator.

3) Citation. It is considered a matter of professional ethics to acknowledge the work of other scientists. Thus, the Data User will properly attribute the Data Set in any publications or in the metadata of any derived data products that were produced using the Data Set. Citation should take the following general form: Creator, Year of Data Publication, Title of Dataset, Publisher, Dataset identifier.

Citation example: Holmes, R.T. 2012. Bird Abundances at Hubbard Brook (1969-2010) and on three replicate plots (1986-2000) in the White Mountain National Forest. Durham, NH. Hubbard Brook Data Archive [Database]. http://hubbardbrook.org/data/dataset.php?id=81 (23 July 2012)

4) Acknowledgment: The Data User should acknowledge any institutional support or specific funding awards referenced in the metadata accompanying this dataset in any publications where the Data Set contributed to its content. Acknowledgments should identify the supporting party, the party that received the support, and any identifying information such as grant numbers.

Acknowledgment example: Data on [topic] were provided by [name of PI] on [date]. These data were gathered as part of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study (HBES). The HBES is a collaborative effort at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, which is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA. Significant funding for collection of these data was provided by [agency]-[grant number], [agency]-[grant number], etc.

5) Consultation and questions. Data users are strongly encouraged to consult with the Principal Investigator(s) who collected these data for further information. Also, when appropriate, Data Users should consider including the Principal Investigator as a collaborator and/or co-author in the use of these data.

6) Notification. The Data User will notify the Principal Investigator of any publication or derivative work based on the Data Set. The Data User will also provide the Principal Investigator and/or the administrator of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study with a pdf or two reprints of any publication(s) resulting from use of the Data Set.

7) Disclaimer. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and documentation contained in this Data Set, complete accuracy of data and metadata cannot be guaranteed. All data and metadata are made available "as is". The Data User holds all parties involved in the production or distribution of the Data Set harmless for damages resulting from its use or interpretation.

8) Terms of Agreement. By accepting this Data Set, the Data User agrees to abide by the terms of this agreement. The Data Owner shall have the right to terminate this agreement immediately by written notice upon the Data User's breach of, or non-compliance with, any of its terms. The Data User may be held responsible for any misuse that is caused or encouraged by the Data User's failure to abide by the terms of this agreement.



CONTACT PERSON

Information Manager, Hubbard Brook LTER
234 Mirror Lake Road
North Woodstock, NH 03262
USA

Phone: (603) 726-8902
Email: hbr-im@lternet.edu

Data file: w5_precip_chem.txt
Description: Precipitation chemistry of watershed 5 at Hubbard Brook lter
Notes on Data: DATA DESCRIPTION: Volume-weighted, average, monthly concentration from bulk precipitation collectors. Data are used only to calculate deposition for HBEF watershed 5. Base cations are available since 1963; ammonium, pH, and anions since 1964. Aluminum and chloride data from before 1967 may have been contaminated by collectors screened during summer seasons, so that average monthly values have not been calculated. From 1963 to 1969, precipitation data were compiled in combined files representing several collectors located throughout HBEF. After June 1969, average bulk precipitation collections from RG-11 and/or RG-1 are recorded in this separate file. These data are physically located at the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Robert S. Pierce Ecosytem Laboratory, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, W. Thornton, NH.
ColumnVariableDescriptionUnitsCoded?Missing value label
1wswatershednoneynone
2yearyearYYYYnnone
3momonthMMnnone
4preciptotal precipitation in mm/month (over any unit of area)millimeterPerMonthn
-3.000
5Cacalcium concentration in mg/LmilligramPerLitern
-3.000
6Mgmagnesium concentration in mg/LmilligramPerLitern
-3.000
7Kpotassium concentration in mg/LmilligramPerLitern
-3.000
8Nasodium concentration in mg/LmilligramPerLitern
-3.000
9Altotal aluminum in mg/LmilligramPerLitern
-3.000
10NH4ammonium concentration in mg/LmilligramPerLitern
-3.000
11pHpHdimensionlessn
-3.00
12SO4sulfate concentration in mg/LmilligramPerLitern
-3.000
13NO3nitrate concentration in mg/LmilligramPerLitern
-3.000
14Clchloride concentration in mg/LmilligramPerLitern
-3.000
15PO4phosphate concentration in mg/L (soluble-reactive phosphate)milligramPerLitern
-3.0000
16SiO2silicate concentration in mg/LmilligramPerLitern
-3.000

CODES

Variable: ws
Code
Description
5
The number of the watershed is 5 throughout this dataset

MISSING VALUE CODES
Variable
Missing Value Code
Code Explanation
precip
-3.000
Data missing or not taken
Ca
-3.000
Data missing or not taken
Mg
-3.000
Data missing or not taken
K
-3.000
Data missing or not taken
Na
-3.000
Data missing or not taken
Al
-3.000
Data missing or not taken
NH4
-3.000
Data missing or not taken
pH
-3.00
Data missing or not taken
SO4
-3.000
Data missing or not taken
NO3
-3.000
Data missing or not taken
Cl
-3.000
Data missing or not taken
PO4
-3.0000
Data missing or not taken
SiO2
-3.000
Data missing or not taken