Tree recruitment data for the Hubbard Brook Valley Plots, baseline data collected 1995 - 1998
TITLE
Tree recruitment data for the Hubbard Brook Valley Plots, baseline data collected 1995 - 1998
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR(s)
John J. Battles
University of California, Berkeley
Environmental Science, Policy, and Management
137 Mulford Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-3114
USA
Tim Fahey
Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University
104A Bruckner Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
USA
OTHERS INVOLVED
Thomas G. Siccama
Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies
Paul Schwarz
Suzanne Wapner
ABSTRACT:
The valley-wide plots are a grid of 431 sites along fifteen N–S transects established at 500-m intervals spanning the entire Hubbard Brook Valley. Multiple above- and below- ground attributes were measured between 1995 and 1998. This dataset includes tree recruitment data; soil data and other measurements are presented in separate datasets.
KEYWORD SET: Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study LTER
biomass, diameter breast height, forests, HBEF Valleywide Plots, HBR, Hubbard Brook LTER, inventory, saplings, schwarz, seedlings, trees, vegetation, watersheds.
KEYWORD SET: LTER Core Research Areas
primary production.
BEGIN DATE
1995-06-09
END DATE
1998-08-17
LOCATION
The valley-wide plots are a grid of 431 sites along fifteen N–S transects established at 500-m intervals spanning the entire Hubbard Brook Valley.
West bounding coordinate: -71.80620
East bounding coordinate: -71.70220
North bounding coordinate: 43.9590
South bounding coordinate: 43.9140
DATA DESCRIPTION
This dataset contains the tree seedling and sapling (0-10cm diameter breast height) inventory of 431 valley-wide plots that Paul Schwarz and others established between 1995-1998. Data collected on these plots led to two publications and a doctoral dissertation ( see REFERENCES). The dataset includes plot UTM coordinates, elevation, plot area, species, and plot sapling counts in 2cm increment DBH size classes between 0-10cm. Physical plot attributes, soils data (soil chemistry, depth, exchangeable cations, and texture) and an adult tree inventory were also collected and are presented in separate datasets.
SAMPLING DESIGN
Plot establishment - The following methods related to plot establishment are excerpted from Schwarz et al 2003 (see REFERENCES): "Fifteen N–S transects were established at 500-m intervals to span the entire Hubbard Brook Valley. Along the transects, a regular array of 431 500-m2 circular plots was established at distance intervals of either 25 m, 100 m, or 200 m". The sampling layout and spacing of the plots was designed to facilitate the analysis of spatial patterns in the forest vegetation by utilizing a wide range of distance intervals between plots (Fortin et al. 1989). "
The intention was that each plot would contain 50 to 60 canopy-sized trees. Some forest stands were considerably more dense than this (usually they were spruce/fir stands), and under these circumstances the plot radius was reduced to 10 m (314 m2). Each plot was identified with a gray PVC pipe placed in the center of the plot with a round aluminum ID tag and UTM coordinates. UTM coordinates were taken at plot center. The plots were arranged along N-S transects originating at the Forest Service road along Hubbard Brook.
Sapling and seedling measurements - The understory regeneration in each plot was measured in a 1 by 24 m strip transect arranged along the E-W diameter of the plot. A yellow rope was extended along the plot diameter to mark the extent of the transect. If there was a slope to the plot, the yellow rope was leveled first—either end of the rope was raised or lowered as needed (plots were 500 m2 projected area not relative to the slope of the plot). The direction of the yellow rope was positioned using a Silva compass. The rope was extended as straight as possible, and the end of the rope was pinned to the ground using a stick in order to keep the rope in place. Typically, the rope was extended first to the east and the saplings, seedlings, and soil depth were measured and then the rope was extended to the west and the measurements were repeated. All live saplings (less than 10 cm DBH) were identified to species, counted and tallied according the size classes (0–2, 2–4, 4–6, 6–8, and 8–10 cm) on the data sheet. All live established seedlings (greater than 50 cm tall but less than breast height, 1.37m) were identified to species and counted and tallied. The height determination was made by examining the length of the plant’s woody growth, not its leaves.
A map of the plot locations can be viewed here: http://hubbardbrook.org/watersheds/maps/images/schwarz_plot_map.jpg
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
REFERENCES
  • Fortin, M.-J., Drapeau, P., and Legendre, P. 1989. Spatial autocorrelation and sampling design in plant ecology. Vegetation 83:209–222.
  • Schwarz, P.A. 2001. Spatial patterns of abundance of northern hardwood-conifer tree species in a forested valley in the White Mountains, New Hampshire, USA. PhD Disseration, Cornell University.
  • Schwarz, P.A., Fahey, T.J., Martin, C.W., Siccama, T.G., and Bailey, A.S. 2001. Structure and composition of three northern hardwood-conifer forests with differing disturbance histories. Forest Ecology and Management 144:201-212.
  • Schwarz, P.A., Fahey, T.J., and McCulloch, C.E. 2003. Factors controlling spatial variation of tree species abundance in a forested landscape. Ecology 84(7):1862-1878.
DATA ACCESS GUIDELINES
Data Use Policy



The re-use of scientific data has the potential to greatly increase communication, collaboration and synthesis within and among disciplines, and thus is fostered, supported and encouraged. Permission to use this dataset is granted to the Data User free of charge subject to the following terms:

1) Acceptable use. Use of the dataset will be restricted to academic, research, government or other not-for-profit professional purposes.

2) Redistribution. The data and metadata are provided for use by the Data User. The Data User will not redistribute the original Data Set or metadata to others without the explicit permission of the Principal Investigator.

3) Citation. It is considered a matter of professional ethics to acknowledge the work of other scientists. Thus, the Data User will properly attribute the Data Set in any publications or in the metadata of any derived data products that were produced using the Data Set. Citation should take the following general form: Creator, Year of Data Publication, Title of Dataset, Publisher, Dataset identifier.

Citation example: Holmes, R.T. 2012. Bird Abundances at Hubbard Brook (1969-2010) and on three replicate plots (1986-2000) in the White Mountain National Forest. Durham, NH. Hubbard Brook Data Archive [Database]. http://hubbardbrook.org/data/dataset.php?id=81 (23 July 2012)

4) Acknowledgment: The Data User should acknowledge any institutional support or specific funding awards referenced in the metadata accompanying this dataset in any publications where the Data Set contributed to its content. Acknowledgments should identify the supporting party, the party that received the support, and any identifying information such as grant numbers.

Acknowledgment example: Data on [topic] were provided by [name of PI] on [date]. These data were gathered as part of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study (HBES). The HBES is a collaborative effort at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, which is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA. Significant funding for collection of these data was provided by [agency]-[grant number], [agency]-[grant number], etc.

5) Consultation and questions. Data users are strongly encouraged to consult with the Principal Investigator(s) who collected these data for further information. Also, when appropriate, Data Users should consider including the Principal Investigator as a collaborator and/or co-author in the use of these data.

6) Notification. The Data User will notify the Principal Investigator of any publication or derivative work based on the Data Set. The Data User will also provide the Principal Investigator and/or the administrator of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study with a pdf or two reprints of any publication(s) resulting from use of the Data Set.

7) Disclaimer. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and documentation contained in this Data Set, complete accuracy of data and metadata cannot be guaranteed. All data and metadata are made available "as is". The Data User holds all parties involved in the production or distribution of the Data Set harmless for damages resulting from its use or interpretation.

8) Terms of Agreement. By accepting this Data Set, the Data User agrees to abide by the terms of this agreement. The Data Owner shall have the right to terminate this agreement immediately by written notice upon the Data User's breach of, or non-compliance with, any of its terms. The Data User may be held responsible for any misuse that is caused or encouraged by the Data User's failure to abide by the terms of this agreement.



CONTACT PERSON

Information Manager, Hubbard Brook LTER
234 Mirror Lake Road
North Woodstock, NH 03262
USA

Phone: (603) 726-8902
Email: hbr-im@lternet.edu

Data file: valley_tree_recruitment
Description: Tree recruitment data for the Hubbard Brook Valley Plots collected between 1995 - 1998
ColumnVariableDescriptionUnitsCoded?Missing value label
1PLOTPlot ID numbernoneynone
2UTM_EASTINGUTM Easting of plot locationmeternnone
3UTM_NORTHINGUTM Northing of plot locationmeternnone
4DATEDate of inventoryYYYY-MM-DDn
0000-00-00
5DATE_NOTENotes about the Datenoneynone
6ELEVATIONElevation of the plotmeternnone
7SAMPLE_AREASample areahectarennone
8SPECIESSpecies codenoneynone
90_to_2CMCount of trees in 0 to 2 cm DBH size classnumbernnone
102_to_4CMCount of trees in 2 to 4 cm DBH size classnumbernnone
114_to_6CMCount of trees in 4 to 6 cm DBH size classnumbernnone
126_to_8CMCount of trees in 6 to 8 cm DBH size classnumbernnone
138_to_10CMCount of trees in 8 to 10 cm DBH size classnumbernnone
14SEEDLINGSCount of trees greater than 50cm tall but less than breast height (1.37m)numbernnone
15SAPLINGSCount of trees at least 1.37m tall with DBH between 0-10cmnumbernnone
16COMMENTSTree commentsnoneynone

CODES

Variable: PLOT
Description:
Plot number
Variable: DATE_NOTE
Description:
Notes about the Date
Variable: SPECIES
Code
Description
AB
Fagus grandifolia
BA
Populus grandidentata
BC
Prunus serotina
BF
Abies balsamea
BLA
Fraxinus nigra
BW
Tilia americana
EH
Tsuga canadensis
GB
Betula populifolia
JB
Amelanchier spp
MA
Sorbus americana
PB
Betula papyrifera
PC
Prunus pensylvanica
QA
Populus tremuloides
RM
Acer rubrum
RS
Picea rubens
SM
Acer saccharum
STM
Acer pensylvanicum
UK
unknown
WA
Fraxinus americana
YB
Betula alleghaniensis (formerly Betula lutea)
Variable: COMMENTS
Description:
Comments about tree sampling

MISSING VALUE CODES
Variable
Missing Value Code
Code Explanation
DATE
0000-00-00
Unkown date